Genie Industries, Inc. v. Matak

462 S.W.3d 1 (2015)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Genie Industries, Inc. v. Matak

Supreme Court of Texas
462 S.W.3d 1 (2015)

Play video

Facts

Genie Industries, Inc. (defendant) manufactured and sold aerial lifts, platforms that raised workers so that they could reach high ceilings. One of Genie's lifts, the AWP-40S, was a lightweight lift with a small platform that raised 40 feet into the air. Because the base of the AWP-40S was small and the lift could potentially tip over, there were several stabilizing outriggers on the lift. The lift's platform could not be raised if any of the outriggers were out of place, but if the lift became destabilized while the platform was already in the air, the lift would continue to operate. Signs on the AWP-40S warned against releasing any of the outriggers while the platform was raised. A church in Beaumont, Texas hired an electric company to complete some work near the church ceiling and allowed two of the company's employees, James Boggan and Walter Matak, to use the church's AWP-40S for the project. Although Boggan and Matak used the AWP-40S correctly at first, they eventually began releasing the outriggers and moving the lift while Matak was still fully elevated on the platform. During one attempt to move the lift, it tipped over, and Matak was killed. Matak's estate (plaintiff) brought a wrongful-death action against Genie, alleging that a design defect in the AWP-40S caused the accident that killed Matak. At trial, the estate's expert testified about three safer alternative designs for the AWP-40S: (1) an automatic drop-down function, (2) a pothole-protection design, and (3) a chain-and-padlock feature. The estate's counsel suggested a block as an additional safer alternative design. A jury found for the estate, and the appellate court affirmed. The Texas Supreme Court granted Genie's petition for review.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Hecht, C.J.)

Dissent (Boyd, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 802,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership