From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...
Genovese Drug Stores, Inc. v. Connecticut Packing Company, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
732 F.2d 286 (1984)
Connecticut Packing Company, Inc. (Copaco) (defendant) purchased a piece of land in Bloomfield in 1947. Copaco developed a shopping center on the property and sold part of the parcel to Bercrose Associates (Bercrose) (defendant). Bercrose was a partnership, owned by three of the four owners of Copaco. In 1971, Bercrose leased a portion of the shopping center to Genovese Drug Stores, Inc. (Genovese) (plaintiff). The lease contained a restrictive covenant that prohibited Bercrose from leasing any of its property to any retail film-development company, like Fotomat Corporation (Fotomat) (defendant). Copaco also entered into a Consent and Agreement, agreeing to apply the same restrictive covenant to land owned by Copaco. The Consent and Agreement was attached to the lease. Genovese then recorded a Memorandum of Lease in Bloomfield. The Memorandum of Lease included Bercrose as lessor and Genovese as lessee, but the recorded documents did not reference the restrictive covenant nor the Consent and Agreement. Approximately 10 years later, Copaco leased a small portion of a parking lot in the shopping center to Fotomat. Copaco’s representatives did not disclose the existence of the restrictive covenant. Fotomat then placed a kiosk on the leased space. Genovese objected and demanded Copaco remove the kiosk. Copaco did not do so, and Genovese sued Copaco, Bercrose, and Fotomat. Genovese requested a preliminary injunction barring Fotomat from operating the kiosk. The trial court determined that Fotomat had constructive knowledge of the restrictive covenant and granted the preliminary injunction. Fotomat appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Newman, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 220,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.