George L. Riggs, Inc. v. Commissioner

64 T.C. 474 (1975)

From our private database of 46,100+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

George L. Riggs, Inc. v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court
64 T.C. 474 (1975)

  • Written by Robert Cane, JD

Facts

George L. Riggs, Inc. (GLR) (plaintiff) wanted to liquidate its subsidiary corporation, Riggs-Young Corporation (formerly the Standard Electric Time Co.). GLR owned 36 percent of Riggs-Young preferred stock and 72 percent of Riggs-Young common stock. In the months before liquidation, Riggs-Young redeemed all of its preferred stock and the common stock of its minority shareholders. GLR’s ownership of Riggs-Young increased to 96 percent by May 28, 1968. On June 20, 1968, the directors and shareholders of Riggs-Young approved a liquidation and dissolution plan for Riggs-Young. GLR received over $2.2 million in distributions from Riggs-Young as a result of the liquidation. GLR reported the distributions as a gain on its tax return but claimed nonrecognition of the gain under Internal Revenue Code (I.R.C.) § 332. The commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) (defendant) assessed a deficiency of about $590,000 on GLR’s tax return. GLR filed a petition for review in the United States Tax Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Drennen, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 745,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 745,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,100 briefs, keyed to 987 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 745,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,100 briefs - keyed to 987 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership