From our private database of 22,300+ case briefs...
Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. GAF Roofing Manufacturing Corp.
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 671 (1996)
Georgia-Pacific Corporation (GP) (plaintiff) entered into an agreement to sell certain assets to GAF Roofing Manufacturing Corporation and G-I Holdings, Inc. (GAF) (defendants). Before the agreement was executed, GAF’s in-house environmental counsel reviewed the proposed agreement, met with GP’s environmental lawyers to negotiate the environmental issues, and made negotiating recommendations to a senior GAF executive and GAF’s in-house counsel. The asset-purchase agreement was signed, but the closing of the transaction was conditioned on the execution of an environmental remediation and indemnification agreement that was to be entered into after GAF had conducted an environmental audit and GP and GAF had agreed on the environmental conditions to be included. An issue arose as to GP’s obligation to remediate a certain hazardous condition. GAF’s environmental in-house counsel met with GP’s environmental lawyers and thereafter reported to GAF management what had been discussed at the meeting. The environmental lawyers continued to speak and scheduled an additional meeting, but GAF terminated the agreement before the meeting occurred. GP then brought an action against GAF for breach of contract. GAF’s in-house environmental counsel was deposed and asserted the attorney-client privilege in response to questions about negotiating recommendations he had made to GAF management prior to execution of the agreement and any negotiating strategies he had recommended after the second meeting with GP. GP moved to compel answers to those questions.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Patterson, Jr., J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 518,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 518,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 22,300 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.