German Federal Supreme Court, 24 March 1999

VIII ZR 121/98 (1999)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

German Federal Supreme Court, 24 March 1999

German Federal Court of Justice
VIII ZR 121/98 (1999)

  • Written by Tammy Boggs, JD

Facts

An Austrian owner of a vine nursery (the buyer) (plaintiff) used a special wax on the nursery’s vines for protection from dryness and infection. For years, the buyer purchased the wax from another vine-nursery owner (the seller) (defendant). The buyer would resell some of the wax it purchased. The seller obtained the wax from the F.W. Company, which obtained it from the manufacturer, S. Werke GmbH (Werke). In January 1994, consistent with years past, the seller offered to sell 5,000 kilograms of “black vine wax” at a specified price to the buyer. The buyer agreed to the terms. Via the F.W. Company, the seller requested a new type of wax from Werke, which was then delivered directly to the buyer. The buyer used the wax on its nursery vines and resold some wax, which was applied on other vines. In June 1994, the buyer notified the seller that the wax was defective and had caused major damage. The wax had been manufactured using an improper raw material. The buyer sued the seller for damages. The seller primarily argued that it was not liable because it was an intermediary pursuant to Article 79 of the Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG) and the damages were outside of the seller’s control. The trial court agreed with the seller and dismissed the buyer’s complaint. The appellate court reversed and remanded for a determination of damages. The German Federal Court of Justice reviewed the matter.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning ()

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership