Germany v. European Parliament and Council (Tobacco advertising II)
European Union Court of Justice
Case C-380/03, 2006 E.C.R. I-11573 (2006)
- Written by Elliot Stern, JD
Facts
The European Union (EU) adopted a directive that prohibited advertisements for tobacco products in printed publications in EU member states. The directive also prohibited radio advertisements for tobacco products and banned tobacco companies from sponsoring radio programs. This directive was based on the approximation provision of community law that authorized the European Parliament and the European Council to adopt measures to harmonize laws between member states to establish an internal EU market with the free movement of goods (the approximation provision). The directive stated that the prohibitions on tobacco advertising were necessary to create uniform advertising rules across EU member states to facilitate the internal EU market with respect to the market for newspapers and radio programs. Germany (plaintiff), an EU member state, initiated an action to annul the directive. Germany noted that the text of the directive was altered following the adoption of the directive by the European Parliament, and consequently, the text of the directive later approved by the European Council differed from the text adopted by the European Parliament. Specifically, Germany pointed to a broader interpretation of what constitutes “print media” in the German-language version of the amended text. Germany argued that the amendments to the text violated the legislative procedure prescribed by the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
What to do next…
Here's why 825,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 990 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.