Gerruth Realty Co. v. Pire
Wisconsin Supreme Court
115 N.W.2d 557 (1962)
- Written by Richard Lavigne, JD
Facts
Pire (defendant) entered into a contract for the purchase of commercial real estate from Gerruth (plaintiff). The purchase agreement required Pire to deliver a $5,000 promissory note as down payment and pay the remaining balance of the purchase price in cash at closing. The purchase agreement also required Pire to purchase another commercial parcel and close both transactions simultaneously. Pire requested the inclusion of a financing contingency. The financing contingency stated only that the offer to purchase was contingent “upon the purchaser obtaining the proper amount of financing.” Pire was unable to obtain financing on acceptable terms and informed Gerruth that he could not consummate the transaction. Gerruth offered to finance the entire transaction, but Pire declined. Gerruth filed suit seeking payment on the $5,000 promissory note tendered as down payment. The trial court granted Pire’s motion to dismiss the complaint. Gerruth appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Hallows, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.