Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Gerwin v. Southeastern California Association of Seventh Day Adventists

Court of Appeal of California
14 Cal. App. 3d 209 (1971)


Facts

The Southeastern California Association of Seventh Day Adventists (SCA) (defendant) contracted to sell restaurant and bar equipment to Henry Gerwin (plaintiff). Subsequently, Gerwin brought an action seeking specific performance and damages for breach of contract. At a nonjury trial, Gerwin testified about the cost of obtaining substitute equipment, which ranged from $25,000 to $75,000. Gerwin’s testimony was not contradicted. However, Gerwin did not obtain substitute equipment. SCA did not know it was contracting with Gerwin in particular, or of Gerwin’s particular needs, when accepting the bid. Gerwin sought lost anticipated profits for his restaurant and hotel business, but presented no evidence of the history of comparable local businesses. The court found that Gerwin’s bid was accepted by SCA, that Gerwin performed all required conditions, and that SCA refused to deliver. The court awarded specific performance or, if SCA failed to perform, $25,000 in damages in lieu of specific performance. The court further awarded $20,000 for consequential damages based upon loss of anticipated profits. The court denied SCA’s motion for a new trial, but reduced the $25,000 award to $15,000. On appeal, SCA argued that (1) the $15,000 award was excessive and (2) the award for consequential damages was improper.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Tamura, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.