Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Ghassemi v. Ghassemi

998 So. 2d 731 (2008)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 30,900+ case briefs...

Ghassemi v. Ghassemi

Louisiana Court of Appeal

998 So. 2d 731 (2008)

Facts

First cousins Tahereh (plaintiff) and Hamid Ghassemi (defendant) married in Iran in 1976 and had a son, Hamed. Hamid emigrated to the United States in 1977, purportedly married someone else, divorced, and married again in Louisiana. Meanwhile, Hamid applied for Hamed but not Tahereh to enter the United States. Tahereh finally entered the country through Hamed’s efforts in 2005. Tahereh filed for divorce, spousal support, and division of community property. Hamid countered that their marriage was not valid, primarily because they were first cousins, and that the court need not recognize Iranian law or marriage certificates. The family court concluded it need not recognize the marriage certificate or give comity to Iran’s laws because of the condition of diplomatic relations between the two countries for the preceding 28 years. Tahereh appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Kuhn, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 553,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 553,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 30,900 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 553,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 30,900 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership