Logourl black
From our private database of 14,200+ case briefs...

Ghassemieh v. Schafer

Maryland Court of Special Appeals
447 A.2d 84 31 (1982)


Facts

In 1977, Karen Ghassemieh (plaintiff) was an art teacher at a junior high school. While Ghassemieh was teaching an eighth-grade class, one of her students, Elaine Schafer (defendant), pulled away a chair on which Ghassemieh was about to sit. Ghassemieh fell to the ground and injured her back. About a month later, Ghassemieh’s back began to hurt. Ghassemieh sought medical treatment and later, in 1978, had a spinal fusion. In 1980, Ghassemieh sued Schafer for negligence. At the trial, Schafer testified that she had intended for Ghassemieh to fall on the floor as a joke. Schafer testified that she had not, however, intended for Ghassemieh to be hurt. Schafer’s defense was that her prank constituted the intentional tort of battery, not negligence. The trial judge gave the jury a definition for battery and instructed the jurors to find for the defendant if they determined that Schafer’s actions constituted battery [for which the statute of limitations had already passed]. Ghassemieh objected to the trial judge’s definition of battery, because it did not include a requirement that Schafer actually intend to harm Ghassemieh. The jury found for Schafer. Ghassemieh appealed, arguing that the trial court erred in its instructions to the jury on battery. Ghassemieh argued that even if the facts established intentional conduct, she could still recover for negligence, because intentionality may be imputed from gross negligence.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Moore, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 252,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,200 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.