Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Giannotti v. Hamway

Supreme Court of Virginia
387 S.E. 2d 725 (1990)


Facts

In 1980, Alexander Hamway, Leroy Steiner, and Louis Adelman (minority stockholders) (plaintiffs) filed a complaint against Libbie Rehabilitation Center, Inc. (Libbie) (defendant), a Virginia close corporation engaged in developing and operating nursing homes, as well as Frank Giannotti and other directors of Libbie (directors) (defendants). The directors had no education or expertise in operating nursing homes. Further, the directors only worked part time for Libbie and had significant other business activities. The minority stockholders alleged that the directors paid themselves excessive and unwarranted salaries from Libbie’s funds. The minority stockholders asked the trial court to appoint a receiver to require the directors to repay the funds that were misspent or mismanaged, and to order liquidation of Libbie. The trial court found in favor of the minority stockholders and ordered the dissolution of Libbie, but did not order the directors to restore any assets to Libbie. The trial court also noted that the directors were oppressive to the minority stockholders. The state supreme court granted the directors’ petition for appeal.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Compton, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Dissent (Gordon, J.)

The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.