Giant Eagle, Inc. v. Commissioner
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
822 F.3d 666 (2016)
- Written by Brianna Pine, JD
Facts
Giant Eagle, Inc. (plaintiff) operated a chain of supermarkets, pharmacies, gas stations, and convenience stores. In 2004, Giant Eagle launched a customer-loyalty program called “fuelperks!,” which offered customers a 10-cent-per-gallon fuel discount for every $50 spent on qualifying groceries. A brochure stated that discounts expired three months after being earned and that Giant Eagle could end the program at any time; however, it did not otherwise indicate that accrued rewards could be revoked. In practice, Giant Eagle never ended the promotion or revoked earned rewards. Giant Eagle used the accrual method of accounting for tax-reporting purposes. For tax years 2006 and 2007, Giant Eagle claimed deductions for discounts customers had earned but not yet redeemed by year-end. The commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service (defendant) disallowed the deductions. Giant Eagle petitioned the tax court for a redetermination. The tax court affirmed the commissioner’s decision, holding that the deductions failed the “all events” test because Giant Eagle’s liability was not fixed at year-end. Giant Eagle appealed. On appeal, the commissioner conceded that the second and third prongs of the all-events test—reasonable accuracy and economic performance—were satisfied.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Roth, J.)
Dissent (Hardiman, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

