Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Gibbs v. Babbitt

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
214 F.3d 483 (2000)


Facts

Pursuant to § 10(j) of the Endangered Species Act (ESA), the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) captured a population of endangered red wolves located in North Carolina and Tennessee, bred them in captivity, and then reintroduced them into the wild on federally-protected refuges. As part of that effort, the FWS enacted 50 C.F.R. § 17.84(c), a regulation that prevented private landowners from harassing, injuring, or killing the wolves if they escaped from the refuges. Approximately 40 of the 75 wolves wandered off the refuges and onto private lands. Charles Gibbs, other North Carolina residents and counties (plaintiffs), filed suit in federal court against Bruce Babbitt, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Interior, the FWS and others (defendants) challenging the constitutionality of § 17.84(c) and arguing that Congress lacked the authority under the Commerce Clause to protect the wolves found on private land. The district court, on cross-motions for summary judgment, held for defendants and concluded that Congress’ power to regulate interstate commerce extended to regulating the endangered, protected wolves found on private land. Plaintiffs appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Wilkinson, C.J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Dissent (Luttig, J.)

The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 200,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.