Logourl black
From our private database of 12,700+ case briefs...

Gibson v. Berryhill

United States Supreme Court
411 U.S. 564 (1973)


Facts

Before 1965, Alabama permitted any person, including businesses and corporations, to maintain a department in which “eyes are examined or glasses fitted.” In 1965, this statute was repealed. Soon after the repeal, the Alabama Optometric Association (AOA) filed charges with the Alabama Board of Optometry (Board) against a group of optometrists who were employees of Lee Optical Co. (Lee), alleging that because the practice of optometry by individuals employed by corporations was no longer permitted by Alabama statute, the optometrists had violated the ethics of their profession by working for Lee. Shortly after this suit was filed, the Board filed a similar action against Lee in state court, seeking to enjoin Lee from the unlawful practice of optometry. The Board’s complaint named the optometrists employed by Lee as parties defendant, charging them with aiding and abetting Lee. The suit before the Board was stayed while the state court suit was heard. The state court rendered judgment for the Board, and enjoined Lee from practicing optometry and employing licensed optometrists. Lee appealed. The Board then reactivated the proceedings against the optometrists employed by Lee. The optometrists (plaintiffs) filed a complaint in the United States District Court against the Board of Optometry and its individual members (defendants) seeking an injunction against the Board hearings. The suit argued that the statutory scheme regulating the practice of optometry in Alabama was unconstitutional because it permitted the Board to hear pending charges and the Board was biased and could not provide a fair and impartial hearing in conformity with due process. The district court agreed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (White, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 121,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 12,700 briefs, keyed to 172 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.