From our private database of 34,000+ case briefs...
Giglio v. United States
United States Supreme Court
405 U.S. 150 (1972)
Giglio (defendant) and Taliento were suspected of forgery. The prosecution offered Taliento immunity in exchange for his testimony against Giglio. At trial, Taliento said that the prosecution never offered leniency for his testimony. A different prosecutor handling the trial did not correct Taliento’s testimony. Giglio was convicted and sentenced to five years in prison. After filing an appeal, Giglio learned of Taliento’s immunity. The Supreme Court granted certiorari to determine whether the evidence should have been turned over as a matter of due process under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963).
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Burger, C.J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 607,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 607,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 34,000 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.