Gil v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc.
United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida
242 F. Supp. 3d 1315 (2017)
- Written by Arlyn Katen, JD
Facts
Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. (Winn-Dixie) (defendant) operated a chain of grocery and pharmacy stores. Through Winn-Dixie’s website, consumers could fill and refill prescriptions for in-store pickup or delivery, locate physical stores, and learn about Winn-Dixie brand items and product recalls. Juan Carlos Gil (plaintiff), a legally blind person, was unable to access Winn-Dixie’s website because it was incompatible with his screen-reader software. Gil sued Winn-Dixie in federal district court, alleging that Winn-Dixie had violated Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) by failing to make its website accessible to people with visual impairments. Winn-Dixie filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings, arguing that websites are not subject to Title III of the ADA. The district court considered Winn-Dixie’s motion.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Scola, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 966,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,500 briefs, keyed to 1,007 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
- AI-generated podcast version of every brief — listen on the go, between classes, or whenever reading isn’t an option. New
Understand your casebook readings in seconds
Use our case briefs to comprehend your casebook readings faster, supplement your notes and outlines, and outshine your peers in class.
Get instant access to over 47,500+ expert-written case briefs in a searchable database keyed to 1,007 law school casebooks.

