Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Gilbert v. Commissioner

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
552 F.2d 478 (2d Cir. 1977)


Until June 1962, Edward Gilbert (defendant) was the president of the E.L. Bruce Company, Inc. (Bruce), a publicly traded company. Gilbert, along with other members of Bruce’s board of directors, wanted Bruce to merge with the Celotex Corporation (Celotex). During 1961 and 1962, Gilbert and Bruce acquired a controlling interest in Celotex stock in preparation for negotiating a merger. Gilbert personally purchased Celotex stock on margin. In May 1962, the stock market crashed. Gilbert received a margin call requiring him to cover the decreased value of his Celotex stock. Gilbert did not have the money to meet the margin call. Gilbert illegally used almost $2 million of Bruce’s corporate funds to cover his personal obligations for the margin call. Gilbert promptly agreed to repay the embezzled funds to Bruce. Gilbert issued interest-bearing promissory notes and assigned most of his property to Bruce. Bruce’s board of directors accepted Gilbert’s promissory notes and assignment, but refused to authorize his withdrawals. Ultimately, Gilbert was unable to repay the funds. The commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service (plaintiff) filed tax liens against Gilbert, seeking to recover income taxes on the embezzled funds. The United States Tax Court held that Gilbert was liable for taxes on the illegal income. Gilbert appealed the tax court’s ruling.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.


The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Lumbard, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 222,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.