Gilbert v. Derwinski

1 Vet. App. 49 (1990)

From our private database of 47,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Gilbert v. Derwinski

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
1 Vet. App. 49 (1990)

Facts

Norman Gilbert (plaintiff) was a Korean War veteran who sought service-connected-disability benefits for a back injury he claimed had originated during his active service. Gilbert first filed his claim with the Veterans’ Administration (VA) (defendant) in 1971, but the VA denied his claim. Gilbert sought to reopen his claim in 1989 but was again denied a service connection. Gilbert appealed the denial to the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (the board). The board affirmed the VA’s denial of benefits. The board failed to provide a written statement of the reasons for its findings, however, and opined in conclusory terms that Gilbert was not entitled to evidentiary benefit of the doubt. Gilbert appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Farley, J.)

Concurrence (Kramer, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 899,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,000 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership