From our private database of 37,500+ case briefs...
Gilbert v. Derwinski
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
1 Vet. App. 49 (1990)
Facts
Norman Gilbert (plaintiff) was a Korean War veteran who sought service-connected-disability benefits for a back injury he claimed had originated during his active service. Gilbert first filed his claim with the Veterans’ Administration (VA) (defendant) in 1971, but the VA denied his claim. Gilbert sought to reopen his claim in 1989 but was again denied a service connection. Gilbert appealed the denial to the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (the board). The board affirmed the VA’s denial of benefits. The board failed to provide a written statement of the reasons for its findings, however, and opined in conclusory terms that Gilbert was not entitled to evidentiary benefit of the doubt. Gilbert appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Farley, J.)
Concurrence (Kramer, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 631,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 37,500 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.