Gilchrist v. Ozone Spring Water Co.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
639 So. 2d 489 (1994)
- Written by Abby Roughton, JD
Facts
Lloyd Gilchrist (plaintiff) allegedly suffered injuries when he fell down a staircase at a plant owned by Ozone Spring Water Company (defendant). Gilchrist sued Ozone to recover for his injuries, and the court held a bench trial. At trial, Gilchrist testified that the accident had severely affected his mental, physical, and emotional condition. Gilchrist said that although he had experienced prior injuries and surgeries, he was able to function well in his daily life before the accident. Gilchrist further testified that after the accident, he spent 23 hours of each day in bed. Gilchrist’s wife also testified that Gilchrist’s condition had deteriorated after the accident. After Gilchrist presented his case, the trial judge requested additional evidence of Gilchrist’s medical condition before the accident, including hospital records from Gilchrist’s two previous surgeries and a back strain, reports and notes from three of Gilchrist’s doctors, and Gilchrist’s Social Security records. That additional evidence indicated that before the accident, Gilchrist stayed in bed 22 hours per day, used a cane, was short of breath, could sit for only one hour at a time without pain, could walk for only one to two blocks without pain, and experienced nervousness and trouble concentrating. The records contained statements from Gilchrist and Gilchrist’s wife regarding Gilchrist’s pain level, limits on Gilchrist’s activities, and other physical and mental concerns. The Social Security records also contained an administrative-law judge’s finding that Gilchrist was 100 percent disabled. The trial judge found that Gilchrist was 40 percent at fault for the accident and awarded damages of $193,703.40. Gilchrist appealed to the Louisiana Court of Appeal, arguing that his prior medical and Social Security records were inadmissible hearsay.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Waltzer, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.