Gill v. Hearst Publishing Co.
California Supreme Court
253 P.2d 441 (1953)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Hearst Publishing Company (Hearst) (defendant) owned a magazine called Harper’s Bazaar. The Gills (plaintiffs) were married and worked at an ice cream stand at the Los Angeles Farmers’ Market. A Hearst employee took a picture of the Gills at the stand in which the Gills are seated in a romantic pose with Mr. Gill’s arm around Mrs. Gill. Hearst published the picture in Harper’s Bazaar. The Gills sued Hearst for invasion of their right to privacy.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Spence, J.)
Dissent (Carter, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.