Gillespie v. United States Steel Corp.
United States Supreme Court
379 U.S. 148 (1964)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Daniel Gillespie was killed on the job while working on a ship of the United States Steel Corp. (USSC) (defendant). Mrs. Gillespie (plaintiff), Daniel’s mother and administratrix of his estate, brought suit to recover damages under the federal Jones Act, the Ohio state wrongful death act, and for pain and suffering Daniel encountered before he died. The suit also claimed recovery for Daniel’s dependent brothers and sisters under the Jones Act. On USSC’s motion, the district court ruled that the Jones Act provided the exclusive remedy for Daniel’s death and struck the parts of the suit that were based on the Ohio wrongful death act, as well as all references to recovery on behalf of Daniel’s siblings. Mrs. Gillespie immediately appealed the ruling. USSC filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on the grounds that the district court’s ruling was not a final decision and thus was not appealable. The United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit held that the district court’s order was appealable. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Black, J.)
Dissent (Harlan, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 788,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.