Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status
From our private database of 18,800+ case briefs...

Gilling v. Eastern Airlines, Inc.

United States District Court for the District of New Jersey
680 F.Supp. 169 (1988)


Richard Gilling and other passengers (plaintiffs) were aboard a flight operated by Eastern Airlines, Inc. (defendant), when they were forced to leave the plane due to two knife incidents. The passengers filed several claims against Eastern Airlines, arguing they were wrongfully ejected. The trial court’s local rules provided for mandatory arbitration before trial. Counsel for Eastern Airlines attended arbitration, but no one from the company came. Instead of calling witnesses, counsel for Eastern Airlines read excerpts from deposition transcripts and interrogatories. For its argument, Eastern Airlines’s counsel read brief position statements. When the arbitrator asked counsel for Eastern Airlines about a potential damage award, she replied that she did not care what the arbitrator would do because they did not plan to pay it anyway. The arbitrator found in favor of the passengers. Pursuant to the court’s local rule, Eastern Airlines moved for a new trial after the arbitrator’s award. The passengers opposed Eastern Airlines’s motion, arguing that Eastern Airlines did not participate in the arbitration in a meaningful manner. The court’s local rule stated that a court may sanction a party for failing to participate in a meaningful manner by striking a party’s motion for a new trial, among other things. The rule provided that the arbitrator determines whether the party participated in a meaningful manner. The court remanded the case to the arbitrator for a factfinding on whether Eastern Airlines meaningfully participated. The arbitrator found that Eastern Airlines did not. Eastern Airlines then moved to vacate the arbitrator’s finding and renewed their motion for a new trial.

Rule of Law


Holding and Reasoning (Sarokin, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 498,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 498,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 18,800 briefs, keyed to 985 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Questions & Answers

Have a question about this case?

Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it

Sign up for a FREE 7-day trial