Gilman v. Bell
Illinois Supreme Court
99 Ill. 144 (1881)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Solomon Bell’s will left property to his daughter-in-law, Ellen Bell, for the life of Ellen’s husband (Solomon’s son), Robert Bell (defendant). The will gave Robert the power of appointment—the power to choose anyone at any time to have an interest in the property. Gilman (plaintiff) was a creditor of Robert. Gilman filed a petition seeking to attach the property, arguing that Robert could appoint himself the owner of the property at any time. The trial court ruled against Gilman. Gilman appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Walker, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.