Gindy Manufacturing Corp. v. Cardinale Trucking Corp.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division
268 A.2d 345 (1970)
- Written by Tom Syverson, JD
Facts
Gindy Manufacturing Corp. (Gindy) (plaintiff) sold 25 new trucks to Cardinale Trucking Corp. (Cardinale) (defendant). Cardinale defaulted on payment, and Gindy sued Cardinale for damages. Cardinale counterclaimed for breach of warranty, claiming the trucks’ radius rods caused expensive tire damage. Gindy argued that the contract disclaimed all warranties. The contract included a paragraph labeled WARRANTIES that said that the trucks were being purchased “as is.” Cardinale argued that, in all prior dealings with Gindy, Gindy did not sell new trucks “as is,” and that Gindy always took responsibility for manufacturing defects and repairs. Cardinale claimed to be unaware of the “as is” portion of the contract. Cardinale argued that the inclusion of an “as is” clause in a new-truck purchase was contrary to trade custom. Gindy moved for summary judgment.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Botter, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
