Ginsberg v. Yeshiva of Far Rockaway
New York Supreme Court
45 A.D.2d 334, 358 N.Y.S.2d 477 (1974)
- Written by Elliot Stern, JD
Facts
In 1908, a restrictive covenant was created for a set of six adjacent lots, three on each side of one street, providing that the lots could only be used for private residences. Stanley and Susan Ginsberg (plaintiffs) owned and resided in a house on one of the six lots. In 1963, a synagogue purchased one of the vacant lots and used it as a parking lot for the synagogue, which was not located in one of the six restricted lots. Ginsberg did not object to the use of the lot as a parking lot. In 1971, Yeshiva of Far Rockaway (the yeshiva) (defendant) purchased one of the restricted lots and operated a religious school in what was formerly a private residence. The yeshiva purchased the lot knowing of the restrictive covenant and aware that Ginsberg had warned that he would sue to enforce the covenant. Once the school was built, Ginsberg complained about the students at the school playing hockey in the synagogue’s parking lot and in the street, as well as the failure to remove garbage cans from the street for days after garbage collection. In 1971, Ginsberg sued the yeshiva to enforce the restrictive covenant on the yeshiva’s school lot. In 1972, the yeshiva purchased another of the restricted lots adjacent to the first in order to expand the school. The trial court found that the use of one of the restricted lots as a synagogue parking lot did not change the residential character of the area. Further, the court held that the presence of groups of high-school-age students and the use of the school property by people other than private residents would adversely affect the property values of the restricted lots and enjoined the operation of the religious school. The yeshiva appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Latham, J.)
Dissent (Benjamin, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.