Court of Appeal of California
248 Cal. Rptr. 741 (1988)
Aissa Gionis (plaintiff) and Thomas Gionis (defendant) were married from 1986 until 1987, when Aissa filed for divorce, sole child custody, and spousal and child support. Thomas moved to bifurcate the determination of the marital dissolution from the remaining issues. In his petition, Thomas claimed that the marriage was a complete failure with no hope of reconciliation and that, while a determination as to whether the parties should remain married would be brief, the parties would have extensive discovery and litigation on the remaining issues. Thomas further claimed that having the determination of divorce bifurcated, and having the divorce finalized early with a divisible divorce proceeding, would allow him to move forward with his business and investment actions without having to secure Aissa's waiver and quitclaim on every transaction. Thomas further alleged that delaying a divorce decree would not encourage settlement of any of the other custody, property, and support issues. Aissa opposed the motion on procedural grounds only. The trial court denied Thomas' motion to bifurcate on the grounds that Thomas had not shown a compelling reason to bifurcate the proceedings. Thomas appealed the trial court's decision.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Wallin, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 217,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.