From our private database of 35,400+ case briefs...
Gladden v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
659 A.2d 249 (1995)
A property owner within the District of Columbia applied to the District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment (BZA) (defendant) for a special exception from the city’s zoning ordinances to establish a youth rehabilitation home on his property. The property owner planned to lease the property to Gateway Youth Home Educational Designs, Inc. (Gateway). Gateway planned to operate the home as a residential rehabilitation program for 10 youths, ages 13-19. The residents would go to school during the day, receive counseling and mental health services on the property, and return to their families on the weekends. Gateway operated three other rehabilitation homes. The BZA held a hearing and heard testimony from the Neighborhood Advisory Commission and neighbors to the proposed rehabilitation home who opposed the exception (plaintiffs). Neighborhood Advisory Commission presented evidence that there were 21 group homes within the Ward, five of which were within five blocks of the one being proposed. Neighbors testified that the area was a high-crime area and that there were too many group homes already in the area. There was also evidence that Gateway’s abscondence rate was 38 percent at its other facilities, and that those youths who leave the facility run as far as possible away from the facility. The BZA granted the special exception, finding: (1) that there would be no adverse effect on the neighborhood; and (2) even though there were a number of similar group homes in the area, the BZA was bound by the zoning regulations that allow approval of a group home as long as it was not within 500 feet of another. The neighbors filed a lawsuit challenging the BZA’s approval of the special exception.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Kern, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 617,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 617,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 35,400 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.