Glenn Distributors Corp. v. Carlisle Plastics, Inc.

2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12350 (2000)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Glenn Distributors Corp. v. Carlisle Plastics, Inc.

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12350 (2000)

  • Written by Mike Begovic, JD

Facts

Glenn Distributors Corp. (Glenn) (plaintiff) operated a business that purchased various items from manufacturers for resale. One such wholesale item was Ruffies trash bags, which Glenn had been purchasing from Carlisle Plastics, Inc. (Carlisle) (defendant), the manufacturer, pursuant to a contract. Carlisle failed to deliver Glenn’s $250,000 order of trash bags. Glenn never made a payment for the order, and it attempted to find replacement trash bags to recoup its lost profits. Glenn filed suit for breach of contract, seeking damages in the form of lost profits. Glenn Segal, president and founder of Glenn, testified to the efforts he undertook to mitigate damages and recover lost profits. According to Segal, he went to trade shows and spoke to salespeople to see whether he could find Ruffies or other supermarket brands. Segal testified that he could not find supermarket brands at the close-out prices he was seeking. The only two options available, according to Segal, were purchasing from Carlisle or buying goods from a supermarket at a higher price. Segal did not identify any salespeople with whom he spoke, and he was unable to provide details about prices and availability. Although Glenn did not have any written agreements with its purchasers, Segal was certain that he would have been able to sell additional trash bags based on his selling history. There was no mention of what Glenn did with the $250,000 that it had allocated for the contract. A jury returned a verdict in favor of Glenn in the amount of $230,000 for lost profits, finding that Glenn proved, to a reasonable degree of certainty, its lost profits from goods it ordered but did not receive. Carlisle moved for judgment as a matter of law.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Giles, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 834,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 834,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 834,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership