Glenn v. Poole
Massachusetts Appeals Court
423 N.E.2d 1030 (1981)
- Written by Sara Rhee, JD
Facts
Glenn (plaintiff) owns a parcel of land bordering Thatcher Road. Gravel Road runs from Thatcher Road over Glenn’s parcel to a parcel of land owned by the Poole family (defendants). The Poole family has used Gravel Road to access Thatcher Road since the early 1900s. The Poole family initially used the road to haul wood with a horse-drawn wagon. Beginning in 1920, the Poole family used trucks instead of wagons. At one point, the Pooles operated a gravel pit and used the road to haul gravel. Beginning in the 1930s, the Pooles entered the construction and snow plowing business and used Gravel Road to transport its equipment. Throughout this time, the Pooles maintained the road by improving it with gravel and by installing a drainage pipe. The Pooles also flared the corners of the entrance to Gravel Road in order to improve driver safety. In May 1972, the Pooles received a zoning variance allowing them to operate a garage and repair shop on their property. This resulted in increased use of Gravel Road. Glenn filed suit, seeking to have the road eliminated or, in the alternative, to obtain a finding that the Poole family’s use of Gravel Road constituted an overload of the easement. The Land Court found that although the Pooles’ use of the road greatly increased in May 1972, their use was moderate and consistent with the general pattern formed by the adverse use.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Kass, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 790,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.