Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Glenview State Bank v. Shyman

Appellate Court of Illinois
496 N.E.2d 1078 (1986)


Facts

Glenview State Bank (Glenview) (plaintiff) held two mortgages on a development owned by Lakeshore Terrace, Inc. (Lakeshore). The loans giving rise to the mortgages were for construction of condominiums on the development. The mortgages were recorded on April 20, 1981, and August 31, 1981, respectively. In February 1981, Leon Shyman (defendant) signed an agreement to purchase an unbuilt condominium, Unit F. The contract contained a rider stating that if the unit was transferred before it was substantially constructed, the title would be subject to Glenview’s construction mortgage. Additionally, Shyman and Lakeshore orally agreed that if Unit A, which was tentatively under agreement at the time, became available, Shyman could have Unit A. Soon after he signed his agreement, Unit A, which was still uncompleted, became available and was conveyed to Shyman. The deed was not recorded until November 18, 1982. At the time Glenview and Lakeshore signed the mortgages, Glenview had knowledge that Lakeshore presold certain units, but did not have knowledge of any purchase of Unit A. The contracts for the other presold units all contained the same rider as Shyman’s contract for Unit F. Glenview foreclosed on the mortgages. Shyman claimed that Glenview had inquiry notice of his interest in Unit A. The trial court agreed and found in favor of Shyman. Glenview appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Jiganti, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 177,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.