Glick v. MTV Networks
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
796 F. Supp. 743 (1992)
- Written by Brett Stavin, JD
Facts
From August 12 through October 11, 1989, MTV Networks (defendant) (MTV), a television network, offered a promotional sweepstakes called VH-1 Corvette Collection through one of its channels, known as VH-1. The sweepstakes included over 20,000 prizes, including inexpensive items such as key chains and T-shirts. The grand prize was a choice of a collection of 36 Corvette automobiles or a 1989 Corvette plus $200,000 in cash. Entrants could participate in the sweepstakes in three ways: calling a 900 number, for which there was a $2 charge; requesting a toll-free number by mail; or completing and mailing in an official entry blank distributed at music stores and promotional events. Each entry method had an equal chance of winning. The sweepstakes was publicized nationwide through MTV’s television network as well as other media and publicity events. Ultimately, over a million people entered the sweepstakes, the vast majority through calling the 900 number. Barry Glick (plaintiff), one of the losing entrants, filed an action in federal district court seeking to recover damages on the basis that the sweepstakes was an illegal lottery. The parties cross-moved for summary judgment. Glick argued that the sweepstakes was illegal gambling through which MTV collected a share of the $2 charges associated with the 900-number calls. Glick acknowledged that there were alternative means of entering the sweepstakes, but he argued that the sweepstakes was carefully promoted to ensure that most entries would come through the 900 number and that MTV intentionally made it more difficult for individuals to enter the sweepstakes through the alternative means. MTV argued that the sweepstakes was not an illegal lottery, because the participants were not required to give something of value in exchange for a chance to win, given that there were means of entry besides the 900 number.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Duffy, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.