New Hampshire Supreme Court
63 A.2d 233 (1949)
Elaine Glidden (plaintiff), a four-year-old child, left home to go to the neighborhood store for candy. Glidden came across a dog named Toby on the porch of the store and began playing with Toby. Glidden climbed on Toby’s back and pulled Toby’s ears when Toby snapped at Glidden and bit Glidden on her nose. Glidden sued Toby’s owner, Szybiak (defendant), for damages arising from the dog bite. At trial, Szybiak argued that Glidden was guilty of contributory negligence. Szybiak claimed that Glidden’s actions against Toby amounted to a trespass. The court found that Glidden was too young to be guilty of negligence or guilty of any tort at the time Glidden was injured. Glidden won a verdict in her favor at trial. Szybiak appealed to the Supreme Court of New Hampshire.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Branch, C.J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 218,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.