Glomb v. Glomb

530 A.2d 1362 (1987)

From our private database of 47,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Glomb v. Glomb

Pennsylvania Supreme Court
530 A.2d 1362 (1987)

Kate Luck headshot
  • Written by Kate Luck, JD

Facts

John and Marie Glomb (defendants) hired Sherry Ginosky (defendant) to care for their one-year-old daughter, Tia Marie (plaintiff), after another babysitter unexpectedly quit. Within a few weeks, John and Marie noticed bruises on Tia Marie’s body. Ginosky gave improbable explanations for the bruises, and John warned Ginosky that additional bruises would result in Ginosky’s termination. Two days later, Tia Marie suffered serious injuries to her face and head requiring a two-week hospital stay and extensive rehabilitation. The parties agreed that Ginosky intentionally inflicted Tia Marie’s injuries. A guardian ad litem appointed for Tia Marie brought suit against John and Marie, and John and Marie joined Ginosky as a third-party defendant. The trial court directed the jury to find that Ginosky intentionally inflicted Tia Marie’s injuries and that John and Marie were entitled to indemnification from Ginosky. The court held all three defendants jointly and severally liable and did not allow the jury to apportion fault among John, Marie, and Ginosky. The jury awarded Tia Marie $1.5 million. John and Marie appealed, arguing that the court should have apportioned the liability for each defendant.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Montemuro, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 949,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 949,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,400 briefs, keyed to 1,004 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
  • AI-generated podcast version of every brief — listen on the go, between classes, or whenever reading isn’t an option. New

Understand your casebook readings in seconds

Use our case briefs to comprehend your casebook readings faster, supplement your notes and outlines, and outshine your peers in class.

Get instant access to over 47,400+ expert-written case briefs in a searchable database keyed to 1,004 law school casebooks.

Case book preview