Glover v. Eastern Nebraska Community Office of Retardation

686 F. Supp. 243 (1988)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Glover v. Eastern Nebraska Community Office of Retardation

United States District Court for the District of Nebraska
686 F. Supp. 243 (1988)

Facts

An employee of a state agency (defendant) died of AIDS. In response, state officials who ran the agency developed a policy of mandatory HIV/AIDS testing of agency employees. The policy required testing of employees in specific job titles, although it reserved the right to expand who would receive testing. The rationale was that these employees had extensive contact with agency clients, who would sometimes bite or scratch employees. Indeed, the employee who died had been repeatedly bitten and scratched, but the agency never followed up with those clients or notified them of the possible exposure to the disease. There was no evidence of widespread sexual abuse by agency employees against clients. In short, under these circumstances, the ordinary medical justifications for performing HIV/AIDS testing were not present. Even so, the policy mandated that certain employees submit to the invasive testing and did not give the employees an option to not learn of the test results. A group of employees (plaintiffs) sued the state agency to enjoin implementation of the policy on the grounds that the policy violated the Fourth Amendment.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Strom, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership