Logourl black
From our private database of 13,000+ case briefs...

Glover v. Jewish War Veterans of United States

District of Columbia Municipal Court of Appeals
68 A.2d 233 (1949)


Facts

Maurice Bernstein was murdered on June 5, 1946. The next day, Jewish War Veterans of the United States (JAWUS) (defendant), a private organization, published an advertisement in a local newspaper offering a reward of $500 for information leading to the arrest and conviction of the persons responsible for Bernstein’s murder. A few days later, Jessee James Patton was arrested as a suspect for the murder. Patton told police the other murderer was Reginald Wheeler, and that Wheeler was the boyfriend of the daughter of Mary Glover (plaintiff). The police questioned Glover, who told them that her daughter and Wheeler left the city on June 5th. The police requested information about the names and addresses of Glover’s relatives who might be hosting her daughter and Wheeler. Glover provided this information. The police investigated the addresses and found and arrested Wheeler at the home of one of Glover’s relatives. Wheeler and Patton were later convicted of Bernstein’s murder. A few days after speaking with the police, Glover and her husband learned of the reward offered by JAWUS for information leading to the arrest of Bernstein’ murderers. Glover did not know about the reward when she first provided information to the police, and the police did not mention the reward to Glover. Glover brought suit against JAWUS in District of Columbia court, seeking the $500 reward money. The trial court held Glover was not entitled to the reward, and Glover appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Clagett, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 129,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,000 briefs, keyed to 177 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.