Gluckman v. American Airlines, Inc.

844 F. Supp. 151 (1994)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Gluckman v. American Airlines, Inc.

United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
844 F. Supp. 151 (1994)

Facts

Upon graduating high school, Andrew Gluckman (plaintiff) took a camping trip to Arizona with friends. While there, Gluckman encountered a golden retriever, whom he adopted and named Floyd. Gluckman was set to return home to New York via an American Airlines, Inc. (American) (defendant) flight. Gluckman called a ticket agent and was told that he could pay for an excess baggage ticket for a special crate for Floyd to travel in, plus an additional price for his transport. Gluckman paid for both and received a ticket that contained a tariff in small font, which stated that American’s limit of liability for property was $1,250. American crews then placed Floyd in the unairconditioned baggage compartment of the plane. Due to flight delays and the Arizona heat, Floyd suffered a heat stroke and later died. Gluckman filed suit against American under several theories of tort. In addition to the tort claims, Gluckman filed a breach-of-contract claim for failure to return Floyd in the same condition received. American argued that the correct measure of damages for breach of contract was the $1,250 limit stated in the tariff. American thus filed a motion for summary judgment on the breach-of-contract claim.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Kram, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 815,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership