Gnirk v. Ford Motor Co.

572 F. Supp. 1201 (1983)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Gnirk v. Ford Motor Co.

United States District Court for the District of South Dakota
572 F. Supp. 1201 (1983)

  • Written by Noah Lewis, JD

Facts

Wilma Gnirk (plaintiff) was driving with her 13-month-old son in her Ford Motor Company (Ford) car. Gnirk needed to stop to open a fence gate. Gnirk put the car in park and left the engine running. Gnirk’s son was in the front seat with the seatbelt buckled around him. Gnirk got out to open the gate. The car shifted from park to reverse. The car backed up, struck a post, then went forward into a stock dam, an earthen dam that collects rainwater for cattle. Gnirk had unsuccessfully tried to get into the moving car. The car ended up submerged in water. Gnirk could not swim but entered the water and could not locate the car. Gnirk walked a mile and a half to the nearest farmhouse, seeking help. Gnirk suffered from depression, insomnia, permanent psychological injury, and physical illness. Gnirk sued Ford, seeking compensatory damages for emotional distress. Ford moved for summary judgment, arguing a bystander cannot recover for emotional distress because Ford did not intentionally inflict the distress and Gnirk was not physically injured. South Dakota’s wrongful-death act does not allow recovery for emotional distress.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Porter, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership