Gnirk v. Ford Motor Co.
United States District Court for the District of South Dakota
572 F. Supp. 1201 (1983)
- Written by Noah Lewis, JD
Facts
Wilma Gnirk (plaintiff) was driving with her 13-month-old son in her Ford Motor Company (Ford) car. Gnirk needed to stop to open a fence gate. Gnirk put the car in park and left the engine running. Gnirk’s son was in the front seat with the seatbelt buckled around him. Gnirk got out to open the gate. The car shifted from park to reverse. The car backed up, struck a post, then went forward into a stock dam, an earthen dam that collects rainwater for cattle. Gnirk had unsuccessfully tried to get into the moving car. The car ended up submerged in water. Gnirk could not swim but entered the water and could not locate the car. Gnirk walked a mile and a half to the nearest farmhouse, seeking help. Gnirk suffered from depression, insomnia, permanent psychological injury, and physical illness. Gnirk sued Ford, seeking compensatory damages for emotional distress. Ford moved for summary judgment, arguing a bystander cannot recover for emotional distress because Ford did not intentionally inflict the distress and Gnirk was not physically injured. South Dakota’s wrongful-death act does not allow recovery for emotional distress.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Porter, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.