Goepfert v. Filler
South Dakota Supreme Court
563 N.W.2d 140 (1997)
- Written by Lauren Petersen, JD
Facts
While celebrating South Dakota State University’s homecoming, Chris Stethem (defendant) drove several friends, including Michael Goepfert (plaintiff), to a bar in downtown Brookings. Goepfert sat in the passenger’s seat of Stethem’s car. As they approached an intersection near the bar, Stethem slowed the car to approximately 10 to 15 miles per hour because the traffic light was red. Some of Stethem’s passengers wanted to be dropped off in front of the bar, rather than walk to the bar from wherever he would find parking. Stethem told his passengers that if they wanted to get out, they could get out, but he did not stop the car. The traffic light turned green. Just as Stethem began to accelerate to drive through the intersection, Goepfert opened his door and jumped from the still-moving car. Goepfert flipped over backwards, hit his head, and fell unconscious. He eventually died from intracranial hemorrhaging. Goepfert’s parents brought a wrongful-death action against Stethem and others, alleging that Stethem was negligent. Stethem argued that he was not liable for Goepfert’s injuries because Goepfert assumed the risk of his injuries when he jumped from a moving car. Stethem moved for summary judgment. The trial court granted Stethem’s motion. Goepfert appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Konenkamp, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
