Goff v. Goff
Missouri Supreme Court
352 Mo. 809, 179 S.W.2d 707 (1944)
- Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD
Facts
Charles Granville Goff (Granville) denied that 12-year-old Marjorie and 10-year-old Dean Goff (plaintiffs) were his grandchildren. Granville married their grandmother during pregnancy but said he was not the father, and the couple divorced. Granville never acknowledged the baby, Joe Goff, as his son. Eventually, Joe married and had two children before he died. A niece said Granville once mentioned having two grandchildren but did not want it repeated or to leave them anything because “Joe was not his boy.” Before Granville wrote his will, he argued with his brother George and told a niece, “I will sure fix it so George and Joe’s children will not participate in my property.” Granville left to live with two nephews and executed a will that named his brother Silas executor, directed him to sell all Granville’s property, left George $5 and Silas $1,000, and gave everything else to his nephews. The will recited, “I am not married and have no children,” and said, “I hereby give and bequeath to any person who might contest this will the sum of $1.00 only, in lieu of any other share or interest in my estate.” Marjorie and Dean sued, asserting rights to Granville’s land as pretermitted heirs. Granville’s brothers and nephews (defendants) countered that Granville intended to omit his grandchildren or that the exclusion clause made them entitled to only $1 each. The trial court found Granville did not know his grandchildren existed, but found they were not pretermitted heirs because the exclusion clause provided them $1. The grandchildren appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Barrett, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.