Gold Kist, Inc. v. Carr

886 S.W.2d 425 (1994)

From our private database of 46,100+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Gold Kist, Inc. v. Carr

Court of Appeals of Texas
886 S.W.2d 425 (1994)

SR
Play video

Facts

In August 1986, Edward C. Carr (plaintiff) began negotiating for the purchase of trucks and hauling equipment from Gold Kist, Inc. (Gold Kist) (defendant). The initial agreement between the parties provided that Carr would have the exclusive right to haul peanuts for Gold Kist in Texas. However, Gold Kist’s corporate office objected to granting Carr exclusive hauling rights. The parties thereafter entered a written agreement providing that Gold Kist was under no obligation to engage Carr to haul peanuts. Before signing the contract, Carr questioned this provision. A Gold Kist manager explained that it meant Gold Kist would not use Carr’s hauling services if he failed to meet Gold Kist’s expectations. Carr signed the contract upon receiving this explanation. Carr later brought suit for breach of contract, arguing he was entitled to exclusive hauling rights. The trial court found in favor of Carr.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (McCloud, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 745,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 745,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,100 briefs, keyed to 987 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 745,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,100 briefs - keyed to 987 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership