Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Goldblatt Bros., Inc. v. Addison Green Meadows, Inc.

Illinois Court of Appeals
290 N.E.2d 715 (1972)


Facts

Goldblatt Bros., Inc. (Goldblatt) (plaintiff) leased a department store in a new shopping center that Addison Green Meadows, Inc. (Addison) (defendant) developed. Goldblatt’s lease stated that Addison would (1) pave the whole area around the shopping center for parking, (2) create at least 1,000 parking spaces in this paved area, and (3) pave a driveway connecting the back of the shopping center to a nearby road. The lease included a map of the shopping center showing these improvements. Shopping centers succeed based on how easy they are to get to and how nice they look. Although Addison did some work on these improvements, Addison did not completely fulfill its promises. Addison paved the front of the shopping center for parking, but left large areas behind the center unpaved and unused. The parking areas Addison created could only fit 732 cars. However, other than the grand opening, there was never a time when the 732 spots were insufficient for shopping-center customers. Also, Addison paved some of the driveway, but Addison never connected the driveway with the nearby road. Goldblatt sued Addison, asking the court to award specific performance and require Addison to complete the development in accordance with the lease map. Goldblatt argued that its lease was less valuable and its business was less profitable because of Addison’s failure to complete the improvements. Addison argued that it had substantially performed its contract obligations. The trial court ruled in favor of Addison. Goldblatt appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Stamos, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.