Golder v. Golder
Idaho Supreme Court
714 P.2d 26 (1986)
In 1979, Diane Golder (plaintiff) and James Golder (defendant) entered into a property settlement agreement, which was incorporated into their divorce decree. At the time of the agreement, the property that the Golders owned was worth approximately $353,600. The value that Diane received pursuant to the settlement agreement drafted by James’s attorney was approximately $13,500. Diane had agreed to this amount because James had misrepresented and concealed the property’s value. James had also told Diane that if she consulted with legal counsel then he would litigate custody over their daughter. A year later, Diane filed an action to be relieved from the agreement. The trial court found that James’s misrepresentation and concealment of the property’s value constituted extreme fraud. The trial court also found that James was guilty of overreaching (i.e., taking unfair advantage of Diane) by threatening to pursue custody litigation. Therefore, the trial court relieved Diane from the initial judgment concerning the property settlement agreement, redivided the property, and awarded Diane an additional $166,125. However, the trial court refused to grant Diane’s request for attorney’s fees and punitive damages. James appealed, arguing that the evidence presented did not support fraud and overreaching. Diane appealed the trial court’s decision not to award her attorney’s fees and punitive damages.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Donaldson, C.J.)
Concurrence/Dissent (Bistline, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 724,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 724,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,600 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.