Gomez v. Illinois State Board of Education

811 F.2d 1030 (1987)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Gomez v. Illinois State Board of Education

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
811 F.2d 1030 (1987)

Facts

The Illinois State Board of Education (the board) (defendant) established regulations requiring each local school district to identify students with limited English proficiency (LEP) and to provide a transitional bilingual education program if it identified 20 or more LEP students who shared a common primary language. However, the regulations failed to provide a standardized testing method for identifying LEP students and failed to require districts to provide transitional bilingual education for groups of fewer than 20 students who shared a primary language. As a result, Illinois districts used a variety of different tests, some of which were not effective. A class-action lawsuit was filed on behalf of all Spanish-speaking students in Illinois public schools who had been or should have been assessed as LEP (the students) (plaintiffs). The lawsuit alleged that the board violated the Equal Educational Opportunities Act (EEOA) by failing to provide local districts with adequate, objective, and uniform guidelines for identifying LEP students. Specifically, the students alleged that the lack of a uniform method for identifying LEP students resulted in a failure to identify LEP students and a failure to adequately educate several thousand LEP students in districts with groups of fewer than 20 students who shared a primary language. The district court dismissed the complaint, and the students appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Eschbach, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership