Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status
From our private database of 19,800+ case briefs...

Gomillion v. Lightfoot

United States Supreme Court
364 U.S. 339 (1960)


 

Facts

An Alabama law redrew the boundaries of the City of Tuskegee. Charles Gomillion (plaintiff), a Tuskegee resident until the boundary change, sued Tuskegee Mayor Phil Lightfoot and other city and county officials (defendants). Gomillion argued that the statute was unconstitutional. Lightfoot asserted that the court had no authority to review a state's decision to draw or change municipal boundaries. Lightfoot also argued that state laws governing legislative districts were not subject to judicial review. The district court dismissed the complaint. The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Frankfurter, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 507,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 507,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 19,800 briefs, keyed to 985 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Questions & Answers


Have a question about this case?

Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it

Sign up for a FREE 7-day trial