Goncalves v. Regent International Hotels, Ltd.

58 N.Y.2d 206, 460 N.Y.S.2d 750, 447 N.E.2d 693 (1983)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Goncalves v. Regent International Hotels, Ltd.

New York Court of Appeals
58 N.Y.2d 206, 460 N.Y.S.2d 750, 447 N.E.2d 693 (1983)

Facts

Eliza Goncalves and Sarah Cecconi (plaintiffs) were guests in a hotel owned by Regent International Hotels, Ltd. (hotel) (defendant). Goncalves and Cecconi each had more than $1 million worth of jewelry, which they entrusted to the hotel to secure. The hotel stored the jewelry in a safe-deposit box that was located in a room built of plasterboard. Access to the room was controlled by two hollow-core wooden doors. The jewelry was stolen, and Goncalves and Cecconi sued the hotel for the value of the stolen jewelry. The hotel moved for partial summary judgment, contending that under General Business Law (GBL) § 200, its liability was limited to $500 because the hotel made a safe available to its guests. Goncalves and Cecconi responded that § 200 was inapplicable because the hotel’s safe-deposit box was not a safe within the meaning of § 200. In support of their position, Goncalves and Cecconi submitted an affidavit by an expert witness, who averred that (1) safe-deposit boxes were an inadequate way to secure valuables, (2) safe-deposit boxes could be breached in under 30 seconds, and (3) valuables should be stored in a vault rather than in a plasterboard room with wooden doors. The supreme court granted partial summary judgment to the hotel, ruling that the safe-deposit box was a safe within the meaning of § 200. The appellate division affirmed. Goncalves and Cecconi appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Cooke, C.J.)

Dissent (Jasen, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership