United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
722 F.2d 468 (1983)
Gonzalez and ten other people of Mexican descent (plaintiffs) sued the City of Peoria, Arizona and some of its police officers and public officials for unlawful arrests and detentions in violation of the Fourth and Fourteenth amendments to the United States Constitution and the Civil Rights Act of 1871. The plaintiffs claim that the city adopted policies which encouraged police officers to detain people of Mexican descent solely based on their appearance. People who did not have valid immigration documentation or identification were released to immigration authorities. The plaintiffs also claim that under the doctrine of preemption state and local police officers are precluded from enforcing immigration laws. The Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reviewed the case on the government’s appeal.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Hug, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 241,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,200 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.