Gonzales v. City of Peoria
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
722 F.2d 468 (1983)
- Written by Christopher Bova, JD
Facts
Gonzalez and ten other people of Mexican descent (plaintiffs) sued the City of Peoria, Arizona and some of its police officers and public officials for unlawful arrests and detentions in violation of the Fourth and Fourteenth amendments to the United States Constitution and the Civil Rights Act of 1871. The plaintiffs claim that the city adopted policies which encouraged police officers to detain people of Mexican descent solely based on their appearance. People who did not have valid immigration documentation or identification were released to immigration authorities. The plaintiffs also claim that under the doctrine of preemption state and local police officers are precluded from enforcing immigration laws. The Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reviewed the case on the government’s appeal.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Hug, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.