Gonzales v. McEuen
United States District Court for the Central District of California
435 F. Supp. 460 (1977)
- Written by Daniel Clark, JD
Facts
Eleven students at a public high school were implicated in a two-day period of unrest and an alleged riot. Officials sent letters to the parents of two of the students, David Barrington and Charles Munden (plaintiffs), informing the parents of the charges against their sons and stating that the school’s principal had recommended Barrington and Munden for expulsion. The letter stated that the school board (defendant) would consider the expulsions at a meeting, but it did not mention the students’ rights to be present, to be represented by counsel, or to present evidence. The board held the meeting and expelled Barrington and Munden. Barrington’s and Munden’s attorneys requested a new hearing, arguing that Barrington and Munden were not afforded due process before the board expelled them. The board refused, and Barrington and Munden sued in district court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Takasugi, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.