Logourl black

Gonzalez v. Banco Central Corp.

United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
27 F.3d 751 (1st Cir. 1994)


Real estate developers sold lots of what turned out to be swampland to around 3,000 purchasers. A group of the disgruntled purchasers (the Rodriguez plaintiffs) sued the sellers, banks, and others involved in the transactions for alleged violations of the Interstate Land Sales Full Disclosure Act (ILSFDA) and several other federal statutes. The Rodriguez plaintiffs attempted to form a class action suit but the court did not allow it. Gonzalez (plaintiff) represents a new group of plaintiffs (the Gonzalez plaintiffs) who sued the same defendants, had the same lawyers, and alleged very similar claims about five years after the Rodriguez plaintiffs filed their complaint. The Rodriguez plaintiffs lost their suit at trial. The court dismissed the Gonzalez suit on the grounds that it was barred by res judicata under a theory of privity. The Gonzalez plaintiffs appealed. The Supreme Court held that the court erred in dismissing the Gonzalez plaintiffs’ suit on res judicata grounds because they were not parties or in privity with parties to the earlier Rodriguez suit. The district court’s order dismissing the Gonzalez plaintiffs’ suit was reversed and the case was remanded.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.


The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Selya, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Here's why 90,000 law students rely on our case briefs:

  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners not other law students.
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet.
  • 12,195 briefs - keyed to 164 casebooks.
  • Uniform format for every case brief.
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language.
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions.
  • Ability to tag case briefs in an outlining tool.
  • Top-notch customer support.
Start Your Free Trial Now