Gonzalez v. City of Aurora

535 F.3d 594 (2008)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Gonzalez v. City of Aurora

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
535 F.3d 594 (2008)

KS

Facts

In the 2000 US Census, over 32 percent of the population of the City of Aurora (defendant) in Illinois identified as Hispanic. At the same time, only 16.3 percent of Aurora’s residents who were citizens and of voting age identified as Hispanic. Aurora’s city council was made up of 12 aldermen: two at-large seats and 10 single-ward seats. Sam Gonzalez (plaintiff) sued Aurora, alleging that Aurora’s ward boundaries violated § 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (the act) and must be redrawn so that the city’s Latino population was concentrated in three wards, each of which would be more likely to elect a Latino candidate. Such a realignment, argued Gonzalez, would be proportional to Aurora’s demographic makeup. The United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois determined that Aurora’s ward map and delegation of aldermen were constitutional. Gonzalez appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Easterbrook, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 820,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 989 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership