Goodman v. Holmes & McLaurin Attorneys at Law

665 S.E.2d 526 (2008)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Goodman v. Holmes & McLaurin Attorneys at Law

North Carolina Court of Appeals
665 S.E.2d 526 (2008)

  • Written by Sharon Feldman, JD

Facts

David Goodman (plaintiff) was injured in a car accident. Goodman retained the law firm of Holmes & McLaurin (H&M) (defendant) to bring claims against the tortfeasors. Edward McLaurin of H&M filed a complaint on behalf of Goodman but filed a voluntary dismissal without informing Goodman or obtaining Goodman’s consent. As a result of McLaurin’s failure to re-file the lawsuit within one year, Goodman’s claims were barred by the statute of limitations. McLaurin concealed his actions from Goodman by (1) advising Goodman that the tortfeasors were insured when the purported insurer did not exist, (2) telling Goodman he was negotiating a settlement with the insurer and submitting three settlement offers to Goodman, (3) forwarding to Goodman a trust memorandum from the insurer with regard to the accepted settlement offer, (4) making payments to Goodman’s account from H&M’s trust account and telling Goodman the payments were interim payments from the insurer, (5) sending Goodman a copy of the complaint McLaurin claimed he had filed against the tortfeasors and their insurer for breach of the settlement agreement and asking Goodman to execute a verification of the complaint, and (6) sending Goodman a copy of an email supposedly from a lawyer in Spain when Goodman pressed for confirmation of the matter’s status. When Goodman learned that McLaurin had dismissed and failed to refile Goodman’s claims and had not sued the insurer, Goodman filed an action against H&M based on McLaurin’s negligence and fraud. The trial court granted H&M’s motion to dismiss. Goodman appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Steelman, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership